Ontario healthcare software since 1999

FHO+ comparison

FHO vs. FHO+: what changed on April 1, 2026?

FHO+ retains the foundation of Ontario’s Family Health Organization model, but it changes how eligible physician time, several premiums and accountability are handled.

Last reviewed: August 11, 2026

Quick answer

The simplest distinction is that FHO+ adds time-based compensation to the existing FHO foundation. It also changes blended fee-for-service and after-hours premiums, ends the former access-bonus/outside-use arrangement and introduces new practice-management considerations.

What stayed familiar

FHO+ did not discard the entire FHO model. The OMA states that capitation payments remain. Practices still need accurate enrolment, service and claims workflows, and ordinary fee-for-service or shadow-billing rules continue to matter alongside the new hourly layer.

Side-by-side comparison

TopicBefore FHO+Under FHO+Workflow implication
Physician timeNo Q310A–Q313A hourly-code frameworkFour codes for defined direct, indirect and clinical-administration workTrack actual eligible time by date and category
Most in-basket BFFS19.41%30% from April 1, 2026Continue accurate underlying service claims
After-hours premium30% on eligible Q012 claims50% on relevant eligible codesConfirm the service and Q012 meet current requirements
Access bonus/outside useOutside use could reduce access-bonus paymentAccess-bonus payments and outside-use deductions endedDo not assume continuity expectations disappeared; use current FHO+ accountability guidance
Comprehensive care capitationCC cap payments were part of the modelPayments ended April 1, 2026, with a defined reconciliation periodKeep prior-period reconciliation separate from the new workflow
Group leadershipExisting GMLPEnhanced GMLP added for contract-compliance leadershipClarify ownership for group-level obligations

The biggest practical change: time becomes a billing input

The hourly codes introduce a chain of evidence that starts when the work occurs. A reliable process should answer five questions:

  • Was the work personally performed by the physician and otherwise eligible?
  • Which category describes the work?
  • On what actual calendar date did it occur?
  • How many minutes accumulated in that category that day?
  • How did those minutes become the submitted units and fee amount?

This is why reconstructing an entire month from schedules or memory creates avoidable risk. The closer documentation is to the underlying work, the easier calculation and physician review become.

What FHO+ does not mean

Not every activity becomes billable

Eligibility remains defined. Examples excluded by OMA guidance include non-clinical clinic administration, uninsured services, work by other team members and care for non-rostered patients.

Not every category has the same limits

Combined daily and monthly limits apply, and Q312A/Q313A have additional ratio constraints. A calculator should not treat all minutes as interchangeable.

Automation does not replace approval

Software can organize activity and apply calculation rules, but the physician remains responsible for the claim and supporting record.

Where to go next

If you need the mechanics, use the Q310A–Q313A guide. If you are evaluating your current process, work through the documentation checklist or complete the free assessment.

Official sources

Rules and processing instructions can change. Confirm current requirements before submitting claims.

More detailed help

Looking for product instructions or additional answers?

The HYPE Systems Knowledge Base includes more product-specific guidance, workflow help and answers to common customer questions.

Explore the full Knowledge Base

From information to action

How repeatable is your FHO+ workflow?

Complete 12 questions to identify documentation, calculation and review gaps.

Start the free assessment